Our parish evangelization effort continues. We held our second meeting this week. Several contacts had been made with fallen-away Catholics since our last meeting, but no one has as yet come home. We also made a few contacts at our festival booth this past weekend and gave away several copies of Trent Horn’s book, Why We're Catholic. Seeds planted, still waiting for any to sprout.
I was listening to a Catholic Answers Live podcast today while mowing the grass. The guest was Lisa Cooper speaking on the Prosperity Gospel. Someone mentioned Joel Osteen and how he has such a tremendously large following. Lisa Cooper said he comes across as a very gentle Christian man which most people find appealing. Even Catholics who may not be firmly grounded in their faith may find themselves attracted to his personality. People can be easily swayed by good looks, a nice suit and a pleasant disposition. The doctrinal accuracy of the message may not always hold up to scrutiny, but that matters little when the listener enjoys the experience.
Conversely, Catholic truth can fall on deaf ears when the presentation is less than appealing. The Catholic not firmly grounded in the faith can be turned off by a poorly executed homily. Like it or not, the experience of the listener is paramount to how the message is received. This is a concern for those of us trying to get fallen-away Catholics to return to the faith. The person who has not set foot in church for many years will be affected more by the experience than the message during that first time back. A priest or single member of the parish can determine whether a second or third attendance occurs. Given time, it may be possible to keep them returning for the right reasons.
During our town’s annual festival parade last weekend, I drove a truck behind an elaborate float representing a Protestant church nearby. They had probably twenty youngsters dressed in matching tee shirts, handing out candy and pamphlets along the parade route. They reached many more souls than we Catholics did with our rather passive tactic of setting up a booth and waiting for festival-goers to approach us. Even more discouraging is the fact that we do not have twenty young people active in our parish anymore. While the Catholic Church will be here until the end of time, there is no guarantee that our particular parish will survive. Our work is cut out for us. Time to get busy!
Saturday, June 23, 2018
Friday, May 25, 2018
Diploma See
“When
we can genetically engineer perfect children, should we? When wealthy adults
can radically enhance their own mental abilities and life spans well beyond
those less fortunate, should we let them? When robots, and a dwindling fraction
of technologically gifted workers, are producing the majority of all the value
and wealth in society, what will become of those who appear unnecessary? Will
they be treated with respect, or as helpless dependents? If the latter, will
the productive minority decide, as some have begun to speculate, that the others
no longer deserve an equal say in the society’s decisions?”
Some of these
questions are already being answered today, and the answer is frightening. Last year, a US Fertility Clinic supposedly
engineered a baby boy using the DNA of three different people. A British court
refused to let the parents of a brain-damaged boy take him out of the country
for further treatment, and instead cut off life support allowing the child to
die.
This is what happens when human beings decide to play God.
Daniels went on to
caution graduates to resist the unintentionally tendency to segregate from
their less blessed, less well educated fellow citizens. He notes that our nation has seemingly
divided into tribes, made up of people with very different views of true and
false, right and wrong. They seem deeply
alienated from each other and deeply distrustful, and this distrust has eroded
confidence in our public institutions.
Again, quoting from his speech:
“There are plenty of culprits here, starting with too many
who have misused positions of authority. The so-called social media – I have
come to think of it as “antisocial media” – enables and encourages hostility
from the insulated enclave of a smartphone or a laptop. People say things
to and about each other that they would never say face to face, or maybe even
think, if they knew each other personally.”
Here, he hits on one
of the major causes of the polarization plaguing our nation today. I am appalled at some of the statements
internet trolls post online. Such
disrespect would never take place in a face-to-face conversation. If the political viciousness weren’t enough,
cyber bullying may be one of the major factors contributing to the violent acts
we see taking place in our streets and schools. This tribal mentality is
particularly dangerous when the tribe gangs up on a weaker individual. The helpless victim may see no relief other
than self-destruction or violent retribution.
Daniel’s term “anti-social media” describes it well.
I find it refreshing
that the president of a secular institution of higher learning would speak on
moral and ethical responsibility in a commencement address. The graduates, and indeed all of us, would do
well to ponder his concerns. Despite our
diverse views, we should always treat everyone with respect.
Tuesday, April 24, 2018
The Quest Begins
Last week, our two local parishes held a dinner meeting to
kickoff implementation of the goals set by our First Diocesan Synod. Over the next three years, the priest, lay
staff, and our parishioners will focus efforts on three pastoral
priorities. The number one priority will
be evangelization, welcoming Catholics home.
Our evangelization committee will establish outreach programs to meet
with non-practicing Catholics in our parishes to provide opportunities for church
participation discussions.
This will not be an easy task. Last month, I wrote about previous efforts
that have fallen short. At the very
least, we have learned what approaches are least effective. This new effort will
take a more direct approach with an emphasis on person-to-person contact. We will be also using modern media to get
people thinking about their faith journey.
One concern brought to our committee involves how any
reverts will be impacted by our parish environment. As in any church setting, personalities
affect the spiritual temperament. It is
no secret that our current pastor’s affinity for lengthy, somewhat
condescending homilies has turned some people away. Parishioners perceive his tough love approach
as angry and berating, rather than loving and nourishing. As a result, we have lost many parishioners
to other area parishes.
In this particular evangelization effort, we are more
concerned with people who are no longer practicing at all, but our efforts
could backfire if those coming back to Mass for the first time in a long while
are turned off by the experience. Those
of us attune to the Real Presence of Our Lord in the Holy Sacrifice can
overlook lousy homilies, but others who have been away will need time to
redevelop the appreciation.
The challenge is to convey the joy we experience in this
wondrous gift during a brief encounter with someone who may indifferent or even
antagonistic. It is often said that all
we can do is plant the seeds and let the Holy Spirit do the rest. But, as our facilitator pointed out at the
meeting, we are also the fertilizer.
Thursday, March 08, 2018
Evangelization Realization
Our parish recently participated in a diocesan synod. One of our main goals arising from the
process is evangelization. The desire to
bring our separated brethren back to the Church is nothing new to us. For the past several years, I was among a
small group of parishioners making such an effort. We met once a week, kicking around ideas and
devising various plans.
Four years ago, we used an old parish roster to compose a
list of former parishioners who were no longer attending Mass to the best of
our knowledge. Sixty-six personalized
invitations were sent out inviting them to an informal pizza party, along with
contact information for anyone who would like to talk privately. Only one person came that evening. We had a very nice discussion with him, but he never fully embraced a return to the Church. Cancer claimed his life last year.
For the past few years, we offered tours of our beautiful church during a
local festival weekend. Setting up a
booth on the sidewalk, we encountered a number of families, offering them
rosaries, pamphlets, audio CDs, and guided tours. Most of them were out-of-town visitors, so we
may not be aware of any impact we had on their lives.
Last year, we organized what we called a Friendship Chili
Supper. We asked every one of our
parishioners to bring a friend. We had a
great turnout, and about half of those in attendance were not Catholic. After dinner, we presented a few
lighthearted exercises to promote friendship. Prayer cards and short questionnaires were on each table for anyone
wishing information about our faith.
We also had a table full of free books, and other Catholic
publications. Despite some wonderful
conversations, we saw no measurable results.
Our most recent effort took place on December 6, the feast
of St. Nicholas, with an Italian beef supper, and visit from the historical St.
Nick himself. The event was well
publicized in the local media. Again, we
had a good turnout. The presentation on
St. Nicholas was well received, but any evangelization that may have taken
place went unnoticed.
It is often said that we just plant the seeds and the Holy
Spirit does the work. That may be true,
but it has become obvious that our efforts are falling short. As our renewed evangelization effort takes
root, the entire parish will need to become more involved. While our previous efforts may have been
icebreakers, we need to engage people in a more personal encounter. Doing so productively will require introspection
on our own spiritual condition. We cannot
share what we do not have.
Friday, February 16, 2018
Am I getting warmer?
With sub-zero wind chills and mounds of snow all around us,
it is not uncommon to hear someone sing praises to global warming. Obviously, occasional cold temperatures do
not necessarily mean the warming of the atmosphere is a left-wing farce. Climate change happens. It always has. Up for debate is the role man plays in the
cycle.
Environmentalists have lobbied the government to impose
increasingly strict limitations on emissions.
Industry spends billions of dollars adding pollution controls to clean and
monitor what they release to the atmosphere.
While we certainly have a responsibility to protect our environment, I
believe many of the fear mongers overestimate the power man has over God’s
creation.
I grew up in a small town in the 1950’s where four
intersecting railroads were just beginning to transition from coal-burning
steam locomotives to diesel. Many of the
homes had coal furnaces. There were no
precipitators or pollution controls of any kind. Black smoke belched from smokestacks and
chimneys. Those who did not burn coal
usually heated with fuel oil or kerosene.
We had no natural gas available to us.
The air was dirtier, but we didn’t seem to notice. Smoke was just smoke. Is it possible the earth is warming because
we have cleaned the air too much? Did
the dust in the atmosphere reflect the suns radiation, keeping the earth cooler?
Scientists blame global warming on carbon dioxide emissions
now. If we inhale oxygen and exhale
carbon dioxide, and if plants take in carbon dioxide and release oxygen, why do
carbon dioxide levels increase, and oxygen levels remain constant? As far as I know, our atmosphere pretty much
remains about 20.9 percent oxygen. And,
if carbon dioxide is heavier than air, what is it doing floating around in the
atmosphere? Why doesn’t it sink to the
ground? I am sure some environmentalist
will give me an answer. (Sorry if I am
starting to sound like Andy Rooney.)
Most every time an environmental protection story appears on
the television news, it is accompanied by video of a smokestack spewing a white
plume into the air. Oh my, look at all
that stuff polluting the air that we breathe!
What they do not explain is this.
The white plume is water vapor, a by-product of government-mandated scrubbers
cleaning the effluent before it leaves the stack. Look
at the following example.
Here are four smokestacks.
All four are in operation emitting product from coal-fired boilers. The difference is that two of them have
scrubbers removing sulfur dioxide from the effluent. Two of them do not.
First question: Which
smokestacks have the scrubbers? Most
people might say the two on the right look cleaner, but if you answered the two
on the left, you would be correct. The
process is called flue gas desulfurization where emissions pass through a lime
slurry that neutralizes the acidity before it is released into the air. The effluent picks up moisture in the process
and what you see coming from the stack is simply water vapor. At the time this photo was taken, the two
stacks on the right did not yet have scrubbers installed.
Second question:
Which of the stacks will you likely see on a television news report
about environmental concerns? Probably
not the ones on the right without scrubbers because what they release into the
air is practically invisible. I believe
the general public, and the lawmakers that represent them, have become more
vigilant about air quality from seeing what they perceive to be pollutants that
are actually harmless by-products of mandated pollution controls.
While we have a moral obligation to respect our environment,
let us not forget that God gave us these resources to use. Because God creates through wisdom, his
creation is ordered. God willed creation
as a gift addressed to man, an inheritance destined for and entrusted to him.
(CCC299) Our secular society believes it
is the only one in charge, a very naïve approach. Yes, we need to keep our environment clean,
as we would our own personal hygiene, but do not let it become an unrealistic
obsession to the point where we forget who is really in control.
Tuesday, January 16, 2018
Upon this Rock!
When I was a teenager in the 1960’s, we listened to all the
latest music on our little transistor radios.
I can remember my cousin Greg, sitting innocently at his desk in the 5th
grade, appearing to study with his hand covering the earphone and wire running
down the sleeve of his shirt. My
favorites were Roy Orbison, Four Seasons, Beach Boys, Dion, and many of the
girl groups, Shirelles, Ronettes, Crystals, and more.
Then the Beatles came along and changed everything! I was never fortunate to attend one of their
concerts, but we all watched them on the Ed Sullivan Show. The shrieks of young girls in the audience
pretty much drowned out the music. My
parents just shook their heads. To them,
it was just a lot of noise. I loved it,
and I still do.
These days, my wife and I take frequent trips to visit our
grandchildren some nine hours away. To
pass the time on the long tedious drive, we still listen to some of the same
music we grew up with. While we like
the same songs, our disagreement tends to revolve around the level of volume
those songs should be played. I like to
hear the music, not to the point of blasting the eardrums, but sufficient to
hear the instruments over the road noise.
My wife can be satisfied with just enough volume to tell it’s playing,
and maybe identify the song. We
compromise and I crank up my hearing aids.
Having listened to the Beatles repertoire for more than
fifty years now, I thought there was nothing much more to appreciate, but
recently I stumbled across several you tube videos of musicians analyzing the
Beatles’ instrumentation. Some of my
favorites are by Mike Pachelli who posted instructional videos on the genius of
each one of the Beatle’s guitar techniques.
I am not a musician, so anyone capable of playing an
instrument is fascinating to me, but I gained a new appreciation for the
Beatles’ music after viewing Pachelli’s analyses. When he played individually what each
guitarist was playing on recordings, I became aware of sounds I had never
noticed before, and they were complex, yet simple and beautiful. Pachelli, a really excellent guitarist
himself, marvels at how these young men from Liverpool created these innovative
techniques at a very young age. It must
be a God-given talent. The next time I
listen to this music, I will be looking for all the subtle riffs, chord
changes, and the stuff to which Pachelli marvels, even though I don’t have
enough music theory to always understand what he is talking about!
And this brings me to what I believe is analogous to the way
many of us Catholics view the Mass. We
can attend Mass hundreds, even thousands of times, without ever appreciating
all of the elements. Sometimes it takes
another person with greater insight to break it down into its component parts
for us. For example, Dr. Scott Hahn,
whose enthusiasm and theological understanding goes way beyond the average
Catholic, essentially does the same thing for Catholics that Mike Pachelli does
for Beatle fans. By explaining the intricate
structure of our liturgy, we learn to appreciate what we experience with new
clarity and excitement. By hearing
someone explain the Mass in historical detail, we can suddenly go from
weariness to WOW!
Complacency and indifference can make the Mass seem repetitive,
even boring. The problem is getting
folks to dig deeper rather than accept a cursory approach. It will not happen without some personal
initiative. Too many of us never make
the effort. To do so can be life
changing, and it is not difficult. It
can be as simple as taking a few minutes to watch a video on you
tube. A person does not need to enroll
in a weekly study, although one may be inspired to do so later. Take a little time and broaden your
liturgical horizons. Imagine
experiencing Mass in an exciting way you never did before!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)