2020 Vision

 

What a year this has been!  With the Covid-19 vaccine now being distributed, we are beginning to optimistically hope for some return to normalcy in 2021.  For Christians, future uncertainty comes with the inauguration of a new president, one who calls himself a Catholic but openly defies much Catholic teaching.  Before he even takes office, the debate over his Catholic disposition has come to the forefront. 

 

 

Washington Archbishop Wilton Gregory, now Cardinal Gregory, stated he would not deny Holy Communion to President-elect Joe Biden despite his pro-abortion stance.   Archbishop Charles Chaput said Biden should not receive Holy Communion because of his support of a “great moral evil.”  Other bishops have made similar statements.  Having bishops seemingly hold opposing views in the secular press and Catholic publications can bring forth discord and confusion among the faithful. 

 

 

Referring to the proper disposition for receiving Holy Communion, the Catechism of the Catholic Church says, To respond to this invitation we must prepare ourselves for so great and so holy a moment. St. Paul urges us to examine our conscience: "Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For any one who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself. Anyone conscious of a grave sin must receive the sacrament of Reconciliation before coming to communion.  (CCC1385) (See 1 Cor 11:27-29)

 

 

Denying Joe Biden Holy Communion prevents him from committing a sacrilege.  For a priest to offer the Eucharist to a person he knows to be in the state of mortal sin would seem to be cooperation in profaning the body and blood of the Lord, as well as an invitation for scandal.  What message does this send to other Catholics who may be receiving Communion in a state of mortal sin?  Might they take comfort in thinking what they do is okay?

 

 

Senator Dianne Feinstein once expressed her trepidation about Justice Amy Coney Barrett's Catholic faith by saying “The dogma livesloudly within you.”  Contrast that with Joe Biden's Catholic faith where the dogma is of little apparent concern.  How are Catholics to react if the Church refrains from using her faculties to support the dogma?  Is this not the most opportune time in our history to make a strong statement on the evil of abortion?  Denying Holy Communion to Joe Biden is merely showing concern for his soul.  I would argue the proper response in this case should be excommunication where the abortion proponent holds the highest office in the land.

 

 

According to Canon Law, Excommunication is a medicinal penalty of the Church. Its purpose is not necessarily to obtain justice or satisfaction but is meant to awaken an individual’s conscience to repentance (canon 1312 & 1331).  Is not the real objective here to awaken Joe Biden to the evil of abortion in order to save his soul?  The problem may be that too many Catholic clergy tend to be liberal on social issues and are reluctant to publicly censure a liberal Catholic politician. 

 

 

There may be reasons why some bishops consider excommunication an unwise or inappropriate tactic in this case, but an explanation of those reasons would help alleviate the confusion some Catholics experience.  A unified magisterial statement would be prudent at this time. 

 

 

As this awful year draws to a close, we look ahead hoping for better days when we can all worship together, without masks, share meals and hugs, and return to a normal life.  After having the Sunday obligation suspended for so long, I am concerned that some Catholics will not take their Mass attendance as seriously as they once did.  Saint Thomas Aquinas understood the effect changing a law has on its binding power.   In the Summa Theologiae Question 97,Artlicle 2, he said the following:

 

 

But, to a certain extent, the mere change of law is of itself prejudicial to the common good: because custom avails much for the observance of laws, seeing that what is done contrary to general custom, even in slight matters, is looked upon as grave. Consequently, when a law is changed, the binding power of the law is diminished, in so far as custom is abolished. Wherefore human law should never be changed, unless, in some way or other, the common weal be compensated according to the extent of the harm done in this respect. Such compensation may arise either from some very great and every evident benefit conferred by the new enactment; or from the extreme urgency of the case, due to the fact that either the existing law is clearly unjust, or its observance extremely harmful.

 

 

Observing the Sunday obligation during the pandemic could have been extremely harmful, and thus wisely suspended, but we must realize the importance of returning to our Sunday obligation when the danger subsides.  In my observation, the most vulnerable, the elderly, were the ones who continued attending Mass, while the younger Catholics were the ones who stayed away.  Let us all pray that 2021 brings forth a renewal of fervor for our Catholic faith and our churches are filled again.

Wishing everyone a Blessed Christmas Season and a Healthy New Year!

 

Biden time again

 

Come January, looks like we will have a new president.  I admit I was surprised by the outcome.  I really thought Donald Trump would win another term, and I think he would have if he weren’t so obnoxious.  He has alienated so many people with his childish behavior that any accomplishments are compromised by his nasty personality.  Biden won not for his own merits, but rather by anti-Trump votes. 

 

People may think it an overreaction to say this election was about good versus evil, especially when the good side was led by a despised Donald Trump and the evil side by a baptized Catholic Joe Biden.  For me, the abortion issue is the paramount litmus test for determining who glorifies God, and who dances with the devil.  It is difficult to watch some of my Catholic friends celebrating the Biden victory along with Planned Parenthood on social media. 

 

 I am deeply concerned about what will happen to our religious liberty over the next four years.  The pending Senate runoffs take on huge importance for determining control of the Senate.  If the Republicans can maintain a majority, some of the liberal agenda may be held in check. 

 

As Catholics, we need to focus our prayers on Joe Biden that he may learn to live his Catholic faith to the fullest, not only for the sake of the nation, but more importantly, for the salvation of his soul.  He will be the oldest serving president in the history of our country.  He may not live long enough to serve his full term.  The job is stressful and he is at an age where he should be taking it easy.  Kamala Harris could very possibly find herself sitting in the oval office one day.  This new administration is sure to be tested, as are we who stand firm in our Catholic faith.

Voting Votive

I said it before.  I believe our biggest problem in society today is a lack of respect for human life.  We see it in the way we treat other people, in the fracturing of the family unit, and certainly in the cavalier way we end the lives of babies in the womb.  Now we have an election taking place where we have two choices for President of the United States.  On one side, we have an aging career politician who leads a party that dances with the devil when it comes to respecting the lives of pre-born children.  On the other side we have an aging egotistical prattler representing a party that still shows some semblance of respect for God, family and country.  

 

Looking at party platforms, there is no question where my allegiance lies.  What makes this so difficult is the fact that President Trump is so unlikable as a human being that even many God-fearing Christians refuse to vote for him.  Using one of Trump’s favorite words, I thought the first debate was a disaster.  These two candidates behaved like children who needed a timeout.  In a nation of over three hundred million people, is this the best we can do?  A president should be able to display some level of dignity and decorum.   

 

In trying to express myself as an independent thinker, I once said that I vote for the candidate and not for the party.  In this election, I will be voting for the party and not for the candidate.  My biggest concern is that evil will gain an even stronger foothold in our country because Christians who cannot stomach Donald Trump will give power to a party that is anti-Christian.  I see people in our own Catholic parish trying to justify their Biden vote by saying there are other issues besides abortion.  They try to make prudential judgment issues take precedent over intrinsic evils.   

 

I don’t agree with everything the president does, and certainly not with everything he says.  I wish we didn’t have to build walls at our borders.  I wish we could welcome more immigrants who are looking for a better life.  I don’t want to see families divided and children suffering.  I don’t like name-calling and childish behavior.  I wish we had better jobs and more affordable healthcare, but the best way to reach these goals is a matter of judgment.  

 

I pray that Amy Coney Barret is confirmed to the Supreme Court before the election so we at least have a justice who respects the constitution and will not try to legislate from the bench.  if Trump blows the election with his acerbic personality and the democrats select the next justice, I fear the end of our nation may be near.  That may sound like an overstatement, but we are slowly being indoctrinated to accept the unacceptable.  This is about choosing good over evil.

 

Now to complicate matters even more, the President and several Republican senators have contracted the Corona virus.  With the election less than a month away, additional uncertainty enters the picture.  Will there be enough votes present to confirm the new Supreme Court justice before the election?  Will the President still be alive in November?  Would Mike Pence be more electable than Donald Trump?  We face so much uncertainty.  Stay tuned and keep praying for our country.

The Beat Goes On

All the craziness going on in the world has brought out the amateur psychiatrist in me trying to understand how we got to this point of societal dysfunction. I do not consider myself to be racist in the least, but I find myself feeling a certain disdain for all the demonstrations taking place at every place or event where people can draw attention to themselves. They seem to believe if you are not causing a disruption, you are not showing concern. In other words, the left seems to be telling us if you are not causing a problem, you are part of the problem. So, here goes my little self-analysis. 

Certain behaviors, good or bad, are observed, either firsthand or documented in the media, and are perceived by the observer as either favorable or unfavorable, depending on the preconceived beliefs (or viewpoint) of the observer. When behaviors are repeated by groups or individuals sharing common characteristics, perceptions are reinforced causing those groups or individuals to earn a reputation. Particularly when that reputation is unfavorable, it often becomes stereotypically applied to groups or individuals. When those groups or individuals are encountered, it affects the behavior of those making the encounter, and the cycle repeats. 

These experiences build on one another forming a spiral effect that can move either upward or downward. People seize on behaviors that support their beliefs and opinions and show contempt for the rest. Hence a situation may improve or deteriorate depending on the perception of the observed behavior. As if assisted by some gravitational pull, the downward spiral seems to occur in society with much greater ease. 

We must look upward on the spiral to find where the present downward spin originated. It’s easy to point at systemic racism as the cause of our problems today. As I have stated before, I do not believe most people are racist beyond the natural tendency to favor similar characteristics. Instead, we behave in reaction to the behavior of others. So, the question becomes what caused the behavior to which we are reacting. And when are we over-reacting? 

Going back to when George Floyd died with a Minneapolis police officer kneeling on his neck, the natural reaction is empathy for Mr. Floyd and his family and disdain for the police officer. When subsequent events occur under comparable circumstances, reputations develop and stereotypes follow. Is it fair? Usually not, but those with an agenda seize the opportunity to perpetuate the stereotype with behaviors that create new reputations and new stereotypes. Reactive behaviors that involve vandalism, blocking traffic, and looting adversely affect those who may have originally been sympathetic to the cause. 

As a white man living in an area where I see Chicago television news every day, I can understand why a police officer would be very apprehensive about making an apprehension in certain neighborhoods. There are daily shootings among young black men who have no regard for human life. Police officers get frustrated too when they find themselves arresting the same thugs time after time. Taking out some frustration on a perpetrator should not happen, but it easily can happen in the heat of the moment. What if black society held itself to a higher standard than white society? 

What if black neighborhoods were safer than white neighborhoods. How would this affect so-called systematic racism? We as Catholics hold ourselves to a higher standard than other Christians. We share our faith by setting a good example. On the other hand, when Catholics exhibit bad behavior, they do damage to the Church and our reputation. 

The same holds true for people of color. The difference is that we don’t always know whether the observed behavior is coming from a Catholic whereas the behavior by the person of color is more obvious. That is why we Catholics disassociate ourselves with Catholics such as Joe Biden who support intrinsic evil behaviors, and why African-Americans would be well advised to disassociate themselves with rioters and looters. 

Are police officers overly aggressive when detaining black males more so than when detaining white males? What observed behavior may have triggered them to use excessive force? Was this reaction learned in the police academy or during their experience working on the streets, or a combination of both? Are the police justified in being overly cautious when detaining a black man? Is anger frequently a factor? 

A police officer who witnesses black on black violence in certain neighborhoods on a daily basis is bound to fearful when attempting to make an arrest. Is it true that fear and anger are incompatible? I once heard that a person cannot be afraid and angry at the same time. If so, do police officers naturally compensate for their fear by replacing it with anger? Any time we allow anger to enter the equation, reactions are apt to become excessive. I’m not saying this is the case, but is it a possibility? 

If a disproportionate amount of fear is present in inner city black neighborhoods because a disproportionate number of armed black males are committing violent crimes in those neighborhoods, why is this so? A report cited on dailysignal.com says that 70 percent of black children were born to single mothers in 2018, compared to 20 percent in 1960. For white children, the numbers were 29 percent in 2018, compared to 1 percent in 1960. Can we trace racial inequality to a disproportionate number of young black males growing up in households with no positive male role models in the family? If so, we need to direct our attention to finding what has caused the deterioration of the American family. 

All of this adds up to a volatile situation in a year wrought with wrath and anger. While our black brethren have a right to protest their concern with the way they are treated in society, riots and looting just exacerbate the situation. As I write this today, we are seeing reports of a group of protesters shouting “Death to the police” outside the hospital emergency room where a 31-year-old female Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputy and her 24-year-old male partner were undergoing surgery after being ambushed while sitting in their patrol car. What kind of people do this? We must address the hatred that permeates humanity. While we have certainly been made aware of racial injustice in 2020, I’m afraid race relations have been set back about fifty years.  

 

Wrath and anger are hateful things, yet the sinner hugs them tight. The vengeful will suffer the LORD’s vengeance, for he remembers their sins in detail. Forgive your neighbor’s injustice; then when you pray, your own sins will be forgiven. Could anyone nourish anger against another and expect healing from the LORD? Could anyone refuse mercy to another like himself, can he seek pardon for his own sins? If one who is but flesh cherishes wrath, who will forgive his sins? Remember your last days, set enmity aside; remember death and decay, and cease from sin! Think of the commandments, hate not your neighbor; remember the Most High’s covenant, and overlook faults. (Sirach 27:30-28:7)

The Insanity continues

Unplanned circumstances allowed me to spend the past twenty days with my grandchildren. Ranging in age from 2 to 9, they kept grandma and grandpa hopping while our son recuperated from gall bladder surgery. Now the house is quiet as we all return to some semblance of the new normal. 

 In the world outside, the new normal continues to be riddled with insanity. Some Seattle protestors filed a lawsuit claiming that poorer protestors are deprived of the right to protest because the cost of gas masks, helmets and other gear to protect them from the police is expensive. If they were protesting as law-abiding citizens rather than law-breaking citizens, they would not need gas masks and helmets. 

 I confess that my meager vocabulary did not include the word gentrification until today when I saw it in an article about protestors in Seattle upset that white people are now living in formerly black neighborhoods. Merriam Webster defines gentrification as the process of repairing and rebuilding homes and businesses in a deteriorating area (such as an urban neighborhood) accompanied by an influx of middle-class or affluent people and that often results in the displacement of earlier, usually poorer residents.

The claim is that improvements in the neighborhood cause property values to increase thereby making it more difficult for poor people to live there. Seems like they want poor people to continue to live in blighted areas so they remain affordable. So, if we try to improve living conditions for the impoverished, we are actually doing them harm? Sometimes I wonder if we Americans have ever done anything that we don’t need to feel guilty about. 

There will always be poor people. Poor is a relative term. Poor people in the United States are rich compared to some in other parts of the world. We need to make sure everyone has an opportunity to better themselves. Those opportunities abound in this country. Some take advantage and some do not. We assist those who are unable to help themselves. I have heard it said that poor people exist so that rich people can get to heaven. That may be true, but asking people to give up their homes to the less fortunate is not a practical answer. 

When I see such prevalent stupidity permeating our society these days, I fear for the future. Protestors provoke confrontations so they can claim they were assaulted by the police. The same police have to protect the protestors from the counter-protestors. Elected leadership, apparently not wanting to lose any voters, allows this all to happen. Look at our public office-holders today and the candidates from which we must choose in the upcoming election. Were these people chosen because there was no viable alternative, or has our societal IQ sunk so low that we do not know any better? How refreshing it would be to find a mature, respectful, intelligent man or woman with common sense, unconcerned with political posturing, to lead responsibly. I’m afraid those days are gone. 

 In the upcoming presidential election, the majority of Americans will cast their vote against a certain candidate rather than finding one to be favorable. It’s not that we want THIS guy to win. We just want to make sure the other guy doesn’t. Our choice will be based on a lack of choice. We have to vote for so-and-so, because we can’t stand the other so-and-so. How sad is that? 

Meanwhile, our society continues to deteriorate. We have governments defunding law enforcement while businesses are being looted and lives destroyed. Some people in public office are actually defending this behavior as some sort of reparation. Maybe we shouldn’t be surprised as intrinsic evils have become accepted and promoted all over the world including here at home. 

In Texas, eight-year-old James Younger is caught in a custody battle between his parents. His mother wants to transition him to a girl and a judge this week took away parental rights from his father which allows the mother to register him for school as a girl named Luna, and have him undergo transgender medical procedures. He is eight years old! This is child abuse at the highest level. Please pray for this child and for an end to the insanity that engulfs our nation.

Calming the Storm

The world has gone crazy.  I can think of no other explanation.  Maybe the virus has affected people’s brains.  Yes, we have problems and some people are treated unfairly.  It’s nothing new.  So, what do we do about it?  Let’s just point out every little thing someone might find offensive and eliminate it.  Maybe the problem isn’t the color of the skin, but the lack of thickness.

Does any reasonable person think Aunt Jemima, Uncle Ben or Mrs. Butterworth were degrading to African Americans?  Are Eskimo Pies derogatory?  Land O Lakes butter removed the image of the native American girl from their packaging.  As the currently circulating meme ironically points out, they got rid of the Indian and kept the Land in typical American fashion. 

In Ohio, the City of Columbus removed the statue of Columbus!  Father Junipero Serra, St. Louis, John Wayne, even Abraham Lincoln of all people, have come under attack.  People want to blow up Mount Rushmore because two of the presidents depicted once own slaves.  The NFL team in our nation’s capital may be forced to not only stop using the name Redskins, but also the name Washington!  Realtor.com will no longer use the word master to describe the main bedroom.  L’Oreal is replacing the word whitening on some of their products.  How long before we change the name of the White House?

How far do we push the issue?  The Roman rulers had slaves.  Should we rename July and August?  I live in Indiana and have been called a Hoosier.  While the origin of the word is unclear, some use the term to refer to a yokel or white trash.  Should we ban the word Hoosier?  None of this makes any sense.  Equality is impossible for anyone who insists on playing the victim. 

Destroying monuments, statues, and memorials will not erase history.  If anything, they serve as reminders of our wayward past.  Destruction only perpetuates anger and division.   Any idiot can use social media to push a cause that will be adopted by other idiots and the national media will pick it up giving the movement credibility.  The Boston Art Commission voted to remove their copy of the Emancipation Memorial which depicts a freed slave at the feet of Abraham Lincoln.  Meanwhile, the statue of Margaret Sanger, author of “The Negro Project”, remains in Boston’s Old South Meeting House.  Inconsistencies lead to lost credibility. 

I wonder if we would be experiencing so much craziness if the corona virus had not made its appearance this year.  Most of our summertime distractions are on hold. Sports, festivals, concerts, vacations, even movies have been cancelled leaving many people with too much time on their hands.  Of particular concern are the subversives who seem hellbent on causing havoc and the extent to which it has been allowed to go on.  What if they had something more enticing to occupy their time?  I doubt that many of them are truly concerned with social justice or they would be acting is a more responsible manner.

We once relied on the silent majority to maintain an even keel.  Has the silent majority become a silent minority?  Tunnel vision in maintaining strict political correctness has blinded people from addressing the real causes of strife in our society.  Words must be chosen carefully to avoid becoming a target, thereby inhibiting open discussion of the issues.  The climate for beneficial change is not good right now.  Making matters worse, the anarchists have gained a foothold in many larger communities where mob rule goes unchecked. 

Now Catholic churches are being set on fire, statues of the Virgin Mary destroyed or defaced to serve what purpose?  As a result, we hear angry reactions from the pulpits where empathy for social justice would normally be preached.  Everyone needs to take a step back and think.  Is what I am about to say going to foster healing or further division?  Is the information I spread fair and accurate.   Every day, I see well-meaning people sharing social media posts that are totally fabricated by someone with their own personal agenda.  Realize you are bearing false witness when you do so.  Check your sources carefully.  Don’t contribute to the insanity.  Be responsible or be quiet.